Nahali'el
How Nahali'el voted in 2021
247 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| ט הציונות הדתית בראשות בצלאל סמוטריץ' | 60.73% 150 votes |
+55.6 |
| שס התאחדות הספרדים שומרי תורה תנועתו של מרן הרב עובדיה יוסף זצ"ל | 15.38% 38 votes |
+8.2 |
| ג יהדות התורה והשבת אגודת ישראל – דגל התורה | 11.34% 28 votes |
+5.7 |
| מחל הליכוד בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 6.48% 16 votes |
−17.7 |
| ב ימינה בראשות נפתלי בנט | 4.05% 10 votes |
−2.2 |
| אמת מפלגת העבודה בראשות מרב מיכאלי | 0.81% 2 votes |
−5.3 |
| ת תקווה חדשה בהנהגת גדעון סער לראשות הממשלה | 0.40% 1 votes |
−4.3 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 2 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| זץ | צומת – עצמאים, חקלאים, כפרים | 0.40% | 1 | +0.4 |
| ר | רפא – רק בריאות בראשות דוקטור אריה אבני | 0.40% | 1 | +0.0 |
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
247 voters out of 343 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Nahali'el against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Mattityahu · Bne Dkalim · Yesodot
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Mattityahu | 346 |
| Bne Dkalim | 536 |
| Yesodot | 312 |
| Yizhar | 564 |
| Itamar | 434 |
| Brukhin | 474 |
| Qiryat Netafim | 359 |
| Alumma | 410 |
10 elections in Nahali'el
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 346 | 266 | 76.9% | +6.3 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 343 | 247 | 72.0% | +4.6 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 332 | 252 | 75.9% | +4.4 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 330 | 259 | 78.5% | +8.6 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 330 | 258 | 78.2% | +9.7 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 288 | 245 | 85.1% | +12.7 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 251 | 195 | 77.7% | +9.9 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 190 | 141 | 74.2% | +11.7 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 95 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 121 | 84 | 69.4% | +3.8 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.