Nahali'el
How Nahali'el voted in 2022
264 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| ט Religious Zionist Party | 55.30% 146 votes |
+44.5 |
| שס Shas | 23.86% 63 votes |
+15.6 |
| ג United Torah Judaism | 10.98% 29 votes |
+5.1 |
| מחל Likud | 7.95% 21 votes |
−15.5 |
| אמת מפלגת העבודה בראשות מרב מיכאלי | 0.38% 1 votes |
−3.3 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 1 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| ב | הבית היהודי בראשות איילת שקד | 1.52% | 4 | +0.3 |
What happened to these votes
4 people in Nahali'el voted for הבית היהודי בראשות איילת שקד. None of them elected anyone.
The list took 1.52% here, 1.3 times its national share. Nationally it stopped at 1.19%, below the 3.25% threshold, and won no seats.
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
266 voters out of 346 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Nahali'el against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Ma'ale Levona · Qiryat Netafim · Alumma
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Ma'ale Levona | 351 |
| Qiryat Netafim | 388 |
| Alumma | 531 |
| Bne Dkalim | 625 |
| Yizhar | 645 |
| Mattityahu | 374 |
| Asfar | 350 |
| Ma'ale Amos | 324 |
10 elections in Nahali'el
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 346 | 266 | 76.9% | +6.3 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 343 | 247 | 72.0% | +4.6 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 332 | 252 | 75.9% | +4.4 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 330 | 259 | 78.5% | +8.6 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 330 | 258 | 78.2% | +9.7 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 288 | 245 | 85.1% | +12.7 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 251 | 195 | 77.7% | +9.9 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 190 | 141 | 74.2% | +11.7 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 95 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 121 | 84 | 69.4% | +3.8 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.