Etan
How Etan voted in 2003
214 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| שס שס - התאחדות הספרדים העולמית שומרי תורה | 55.61% 119 votes |
+47.4 |
| מחל הליכוד עם אריאל שרון לראשות הממשלה | 17.29% 37 votes |
−12.1 |
| ב המפד"ל - המפלגה הדתית לאומית, המזרחי - הפועל המזרחי בארץ ישראל | 13.08% 28 votes |
+8.9 |
| ם עם אחד בראשות עמיר פרץ | 5.61% 12 votes |
+2.9 |
| ג יהדות התורה והשבת אגודת ישראל - דגל התורה | 1.40% 3 votes |
−2.9 |
| יש שינוי מפלגת החילונים ומעמד הביניים | 1.40% 3 votes |
−10.9 |
| ל האיחוד הלאומי ישראל ביתנו - מולדת תקומה | 1.40% 3 votes |
−4.1 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 5 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (1.5%), even where their share here was far larger.
| נץ | חרות | 2.34% | 5 | +1.2 |
| זנ | אהבת ישראל בנשיאות גדול המקובלים הרב כדורי | 0.47% | 1 | +0.3 |
| צ | צומת | 0.47% | 1 | +0.4 |
| קנ | עלה ירוק | 0.47% | 1 | −0.7 |
| רק | הירוקים | 0.47% | 1 | +0.1 |
What happened to these votes
5 people in Etan voted for חרות. None of them elected anyone.
The list took 2.34% here, 2.0 times its national share. Nationally it stopped at 1.15%, below the 1.5% threshold, and won no seats.
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
218 voters out of 270 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has a stable position in only one election.
Etan against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
10 elections in Etan
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 380 | 313 | 82.4% | +11.7 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 366 | 270 | 73.8% | +6.3 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 350 | 274 | 78.3% | +6.8 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 354 | 281 | 79.4% | +9.5 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 347 | 268 | 77.2% | +8.8 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 310 | 255 | 82.3% | +9.9 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 304 | 223 | 73.4% | +5.6 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 277 | 196 | 70.8% | +8.3 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 178 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 270 | 218 | 80.7% | +15.1 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.