Etan
How Etan voted in 2020
273 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| מחל הליכוד בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 64.47% 176 votes |
+35.0 |
| שס התאחדות הספרדים שומרי תורה תנועתו של מרן הרב עובדיה יוסף זצ"ל | 17.58% 48 votes |
+9.9 |
| טב ימינה הימין החדש – הבית היהודי – האיחוד הלאומי | 8.06% 22 votes |
+2.8 |
| ג יהדות התורה והשבת אגודת ישראל - דגל התורה | 5.13% 14 votes |
−0.9 |
| פה כחול לבן בראשות בני גנץ | 2.20% 6 votes |
−24.4 |
| אמת העבודה - גשר - מרצ | 0.37% 1 votes |
−5.5 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 2 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| נץ | עוצמה יהודית בראשות איתמר בן גביר | 1.83% | 5 | +1.4 |
| נ | קול הנשים | 0.37% | 1 | +0.3 |
What happened to these votes
5 people in Etan voted for עוצמה יהודית בראשות איתמר בן גביר. None of them elected anyone.
The list took 1.83% here, 4.3 times its national share. Nationally it stopped at 0.42%, below the 3.25% threshold, and won no seats.
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
274 voters out of 350 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has a stable position in only one election.
Etan against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Suseya | 526 |
| Pedu'el | 933 |
| Qeshet | 308 |
| Avne Hefez | 881 |
| Haspin | 620 |
| Dalton | 490 |
| Even Shemu'el | 785 |
| Sha'alvim | 638 |
10 elections in Etan
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 380 | 313 | 82.4% | +11.7 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 366 | 270 | 73.8% | +6.3 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 350 | 274 | 78.3% | +6.8 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 354 | 281 | 79.4% | +9.5 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 347 | 268 | 77.2% | +8.8 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 310 | 255 | 82.3% | +9.9 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 304 | 223 | 73.4% | +5.6 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 277 | 196 | 70.8% | +8.3 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 178 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 270 | 218 | 80.7% | +15.1 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.