Kefar Haruv
How Kefar Haruv voted in 2019
240 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| פה כחול לבן - בראשות בני גנץ ויאיר לפיד | 64.17% 154 votes |
+38.2 |
| אמת העבודה - גשר בראשות עמיר פרץ ואורלי לוי אבקסיס | 15.42% 37 votes |
+10.6 |
| מרצ המחנה הדמוקרטי בהנהגת הורוביץ, שפיר וברק | 9.17% 22 votes |
+4.8 |
| מחל הליכוד בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 8.33% 20 votes |
−16.8 |
| ל ישראל ביתנו בראשות אביגדור ליברמן | 1.25% 3 votes |
−5.7 |
| טב ימינה בראשות איילת שקד הבית היהודי-האיחוד הלאומי-הימין החדש | 0.83% 2 votes |
−5.0 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 2 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| צן | צפון | 0.42% | 1 | +0.4 |
| רק | רון קובי - הימין החילוני נלחמים בכפיה החרדית | 0.42% | 1 | +0.4 |
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
240 voters out of 385 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Kefar Haruv against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Mefallesim · Kefar Szold · Lahavot Haviva
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Mefallesim | 477 |
| Kefar Szold | 350 |
| Lahavot Haviva | 463 |
| Mishmarot | 467 |
| Hanita | 465 |
| Shefayim | 755 |
| Kefar Netter | 577 |
| Herut | 759 |
10 elections in Kefar Haruv
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 427 | 268 | 62.8% | −7.9 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 405 | 248 | 61.2% | −6.2 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 400 | 236 | 59.0% | −12.5 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 385 | 240 | 62.3% | −7.5 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 379 | 243 | 64.1% | −4.3 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 332 | 216 | 65.1% | −7.3 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 298 | 167 | 56.0% | −11.7 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 271 | 173 | 63.8% | +1.3 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 136 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 192 | 117 | 60.9% | −4.7 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.