Kefar Haruv
How Kefar Haruv voted in 2021
247 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| פה יש עתיד בראשות יאיר לפיד | 31.98% 79 votes |
+18.1 |
| אמת מפלגת העבודה בראשות מרב מיכאלי | 19.03% 47 votes |
+12.9 |
| כן כחול לבן בראשות בני גנץ | 14.57% 36 votes |
+7.9 |
| מרצ מרצ – השמאל של ישראל | 10.93% 27 votes |
+6.3 |
| ת תקווה חדשה בהנהגת גדעון סער לראשות הממשלה | 8.10% 20 votes |
+3.4 |
| מחל הליכוד בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 6.88% 17 votes |
−17.3 |
| ל ישראל ביתנו בראשות אביגדור ליברמן | 4.05% 10 votes |
−1.6 |
| ב ימינה בראשות נפתלי בנט | 2.83% 7 votes |
−3.4 |
| ט הציונות הדתית בראשות בצלאל סמוטריץ' | 0.40% 1 votes |
−4.7 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 2 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| יז | הכלכלית החדשה בראשות פרופסור ירון זליכה | 0.81% | 2 | +0.0 |
| רנ | התקווה לשינוי | 0.40% | 1 | +0.4 |
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
248 voters out of 405 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Kefar Haruv against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Ramat HaKovesh · Lohame HaGeta'ot · Yas'ur
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Ramat HaKovesh | 523 |
| Lohame HaGeta'ot | 449 |
| Yas'ur | 384 |
| Gat(Qibbuz) | 423 |
| Manof | 464 |
| Deganya Alef | 352 |
| Lahavot Haviva | 475 |
| Kammon | 436 |
10 elections in Kefar Haruv
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 427 | 268 | 62.8% | −7.9 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 405 | 248 | 61.2% | −6.2 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 400 | 236 | 59.0% | −12.5 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 385 | 240 | 62.3% | −7.5 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 379 | 243 | 64.1% | −4.3 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 332 | 216 | 65.1% | −7.3 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 298 | 167 | 56.0% | −11.7 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 271 | 173 | 63.8% | +1.3 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 136 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 192 | 117 | 60.9% | −4.7 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.