Netiv HaLamed-He
Also recorded by the Central Elections Committee as נתיב הלה
How Netiv HaLamed-He voted in 2020
349 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| פה כחול לבן בראשות בני גנץ | 59.03% 206 votes |
+32.4 |
| אמת העבודה - גשר - מרצ | 31.52% 110 votes |
+25.7 |
| ל ישראל ביתנו בראשות אביגדור ליברמן | 3.44% 12 votes |
−2.3 |
| מחל הליכוד בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 2.87% 10 votes |
−26.6 |
| טב ימינה הימין החדש – הבית היהודי – האיחוד הלאומי | 1.43% 5 votes |
−3.8 |
| ודעם הרשימה המשותפת חד"ש, רע"מ, תע"ל, בל"ד | 1.15% 4 votes |
−11.5 |
| שס התאחדות הספרדים שומרי תורה תנועתו של מרן הרב עובדיה יוסף זצ"ל | 0.29% 1 votes |
−7.4 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 1 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| נ | קול הנשים | 0.29% | 1 | +0.2 |
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
351 voters out of 462 eligible.
The line is the locality's path across the elections; the filled dot is the latest.
The position is derived from locality-level results and describes a place, not people. Movement on the map does not show that particular voters changed their vote.
Netiv HaLamed-He against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Kefar Hess · Sarigim (Li-On) · Kabri
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Kefar Hess | 801 |
| Sarigim (Li-On) | 566 |
| Kabri | 600 |
| Gal'on | 326 |
| Ramat HaKovesh | 532 |
| Hazerim | 599 |
| En HaHoresh | 543 |
| Bahan | 461 |
10 elections in Netiv HaLamed-He
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 501 | 370 | 73.9% | +3.2 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 480 | 353 | 73.5% | +6.1 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 462 | 351 | 76.0% | +4.5 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 458 | 349 | 76.2% | +6.3 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 448 | 346 | 77.2% | +8.8 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 409 | 321 | 78.5% | +6.1 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 391 | 306 | 78.3% | +10.5 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 347 | 255 | 73.5% | +11.0 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 232 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 316 | 262 | 82.9% | +17.3 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.