Netiv HaLamed-He
Also recorded by the Central Elections Committee as נתיב הלה
How Netiv HaLamed-He voted in 2021
350 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| אמת מפלגת העבודה בראשות מרב מיכאלי | 40.86% 143 votes |
+34.8 |
| פה יש עתיד בראשות יאיר לפיד | 18.29% 64 votes |
+4.4 |
| מרצ מרצ – השמאל של ישראל | 16.57% 58 votes |
+12.0 |
| כן כחול לבן בראשות בני גנץ | 13.14% 46 votes |
+6.5 |
| ב ימינה בראשות נפתלי בנט | 2.57% 9 votes |
−3.6 |
| מחל הליכוד בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 2.57% 9 votes |
−21.6 |
| ת תקווה חדשה בהנהגת גדעון סער לראשות הממשלה | 2.57% 9 votes |
−2.2 |
| ל ישראל ביתנו בראשות אביגדור ליברמן | 2.29% 8 votes |
−3.3 |
| ט הציונות הדתית בראשות בצלאל סמוטריץ' | 0.29% 1 votes |
−4.8 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 1 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| יז | הכלכלית החדשה בראשות פרופסור ירון זליכה | 0.86% | 3 | +0.1 |
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
353 voters out of 480 eligible.
The line is the locality's path across the elections; the filled dot is the latest.
The position is derived from locality-level results and describes a place, not people. Movement on the map does not show that particular voters changed their vote.
Netiv HaLamed-He against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Enat · Geva · Gat(Qibbuz)
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Enat | 483 |
| Geva | 383 |
| Gat(Qibbuz) | 423 |
| Yizre'el | 346 |
| Nir Dawid (Tel Amal) | 477 |
| Lahavot Haviva | 475 |
| Ga'ton | 390 |
| Deganya Alef | 352 |
10 elections in Netiv HaLamed-He
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 501 | 370 | 73.9% | +3.2 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 480 | 353 | 73.5% | +6.1 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 462 | 351 | 76.0% | +4.5 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 458 | 349 | 76.2% | +6.3 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 448 | 346 | 77.2% | +8.8 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 409 | 321 | 78.5% | +6.1 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 391 | 306 | 78.3% | +10.5 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 347 | 255 | 73.5% | +11.0 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 232 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 316 | 262 | 82.9% | +17.3 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.