Nir Oz
How Nir Oz voted in 2009
234 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| כן קדימה – עם ציפי לבני לראשות הממשלה | 41.45% 97 votes |
+19.0 |
| מרצ התנועה החדשה מרצ | 35.04% 82 votes |
+32.1 |
| אמת העבודה בראשות אהוד ברק | 15.38% 36 votes |
+5.5 |
| ל ישראל ביתנו בראשות אביגדור ליברמן | 2.99% 7 votes |
−8.7 |
| מחל הליכוד – אח"י בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 1.71% 4 votes |
−19.9 |
| ו חד"ש החזית הדמוקרטית לשלום ושיוויון (המפלגה הקומוניסטית הישראלית וחוגי ציבור ערבים ויהודים) | 0.85% 2 votes |
−2.5 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 5 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (2.0%), even where their share here was far larger.
| רק | הירוקים – למען ישראל ירוקה | 0.85% | 2 | +0.5 |
| ה | התנועה היירוקה מימד בראשות הרב מלכיאור וערן בן-ימיני | 0.43% | 1 | −0.4 |
| חי | ישראל חזקה בראשות ד"ר אפרים סנה | 0.43% | 1 | +0.2 |
| קנ | עלה ירוק | 0.43% | 1 | +0.0 |
| קפ | כוח הכסף – למיגור שלטון הבנקים | 0.43% | 1 | +0.4 |
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
235 voters out of 315 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Nir Oz against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Gan Shemu'el · Gazit · Negba
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Gan Shemu'el | 607 |
| Gazit | 408 |
| Negba | 337 |
| Hanita | 331 |
| Mishmar HaNegev | 392 |
| En HaHoresh | 507 |
| HaZorea | 580 |
| Bet Alfa | 356 |
10 elections in Nir Oz
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 329 | 241 | 73.3% | +2.6 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 332 | 242 | 72.9% | +5.4 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 329 | 244 | 74.2% | +2.6 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 325 | 225 | 69.2% | −0.6 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 329 | 247 | 75.1% | +6.6 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 344 | 269 | 78.2% | +5.9 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 339 | 256 | 75.5% | +7.7 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 315 | 235 | 74.6% | +12.1 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 237 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 337 | 251 | 74.5% | +8.9 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.