Nir Oz
How Nir Oz voted in 2021
240 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| מרצ מרצ – השמאל של ישראל | 36.67% 88 votes |
+32.1 |
| אמת מפלגת העבודה בראשות מרב מיכאלי | 23.33% 56 votes |
+17.2 |
| פה יש עתיד בראשות יאיר לפיד | 18.75% 45 votes |
+4.8 |
| כן כחול לבן בראשות בני גנץ | 6.67% 16 votes |
+0.0 |
| מחל הליכוד בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 5.83% 14 votes |
−18.4 |
| ב ימינה בראשות נפתלי בנט | 2.92% 7 votes |
−3.3 |
| ל ישראל ביתנו בראשות אביגדור ליברמן | 2.92% 7 votes |
−2.7 |
| ת תקווה חדשה בהנהגת גדעון סער לראשות הממשלה | 1.67% 4 votes |
−3.1 |
| שס התאחדות הספרדים שומרי תורה תנועתו של מרן הרב עובדיה יוסף זצ"ל | 0.42% 1 votes |
−6.7 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 1 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| יז | הכלכלית החדשה בראשות פרופסור ירון זליכה | 0.83% | 2 | +0.0 |
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
242 voters out of 332 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Nir Oz against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Bet HaEmeq · Bahan · Hazerim
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Bet HaEmeq | 359 |
| Bahan | 488 |
| Hazerim | 616 |
| Karkom | 303 |
| Hazor-Ashdod | 474 |
| Mizra | 507 |
| En HaHoresh | 527 |
| En HaNaziv | 309 |
10 elections in Nir Oz
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 329 | 241 | 73.3% | +2.6 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 332 | 242 | 72.9% | +5.4 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 329 | 244 | 74.2% | +2.6 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 325 | 225 | 69.2% | −0.6 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 329 | 247 | 75.1% | +6.6 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 344 | 269 | 78.2% | +5.9 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 339 | 256 | 75.5% | +7.7 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 315 | 235 | 74.6% | +12.1 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 237 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 337 | 251 | 74.5% | +8.9 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.