HaOn
How HaOn voted in 2003
86 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| אמת העבודה - מימד בראשות מצנע | 47.67% 41 votes |
+33.2 |
| יש שינוי מפלגת החילונים ומעמד הביניים | 17.44% 15 votes |
+5.2 |
| מחל הליכוד עם אריאל שרון לראשות הממשלה | 13.95% 12 votes |
−15.4 |
| מרצ מרצ - הבחירה הדמוקרטית - שחר | 9.30% 8 votes |
+4.1 |
| ל האיחוד הלאומי ישראל ביתנו - מולדת תקומה | 3.49% 3 votes |
−2.0 |
| ב המפד"ל - המפלגה הדתית לאומית, המזרחי - הפועל המזרחי בארץ ישראל | 2.33% 2 votes |
−1.9 |
| עם הרשימה הערבית המאוחדת | 1.16% 1 votes |
−0.9 |
| שס שס - התאחדות הספרדים העולמית שומרי תורה | 1.16% 1 votes |
−7.1 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 2 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (1.5%), even where their share here was far larger.
| נ | ישראל אחרת כי נשבר מהפוליטיקאים | 2.33% | 2 | +2.1 |
| רק | הירוקים | 1.16% | 1 | +0.8 |
What happened to these votes
2 people in HaOn voted for ישראל אחרת כי נשבר מהפוליטיקאים. None of them elected anyone.
The list took 2.33% here, 10.2 times its national share. Nationally it stopped at 0.23%, below the 1.5% threshold, and won no seats.
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
86 voters out of 155 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
HaOn against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Palmahim · HaSolelim · Merhavya(Moshav)
10 elections in HaOn
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 157 | 84 | 53.5% | −17.1 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 148 | 85 | 57.4% | −10.0 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 154 | 87 | 56.5% | −15.0 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 152 | 92 | 60.5% | −9.3 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 153 | 94 | 61.4% | −7.0 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 164 | 102 | 62.2% | −10.1 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 167 | 106 | 63.5% | −4.3 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 155 | 91 | 58.7% | −3.8 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 90 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 155 | 86 | 55.5% | −10.1 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.