HaOn
How HaOn voted in 2022
84 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| פה Yesh Atid | 34.52% 29 votes |
+16.7 |
| אמת מפלגת העבודה בראשות מרב מיכאלי | 32.14% 27 votes |
+28.4 |
| מחל Likud | 13.10% 11 votes |
−10.3 |
| כן National Unity | 7.14% 6 votes |
−1.9 |
| ט Religious Zionist Party | 3.57% 3 votes |
−7.3 |
| שס Shas | 2.38% 2 votes |
−5.9 |
| ל Yisrael Beiteinu | 1.19% 1 votes |
−3.3 |
| עם Ra'am | 1.19% 1 votes |
−2.9 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 2 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| מרצ | מרצ השמאל של ישראל בראשות זהבה גלאון | 3.57% | 3 | +0.4 |
| ב | הבית היהודי בראשות איילת שקד | 1.19% | 1 | −0.0 |
What happened to these votes
3 people in HaOn voted for מרצ השמאל של ישראל בראשות זהבה גלאון. None of them elected anyone.
The list took 3.57% here, 1.1 times its national share. Nationally it stopped at 3.16%, below the 3.25% threshold, and won no seats.
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
84 voters out of 157 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
HaOn against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Kefar HaNasi · Ammiqam · Bat Shelomo
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Kefar HaNasi | 402 |
| Ammiqam | 394 |
| Bat Shelomo | 323 |
| Shilat | 413 |
| Hannaton | 411 |
| Hazeva | 407 |
| Avi'el | 402 |
| En Harod (Ihud) | 363 |
10 elections in HaOn
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 157 | 84 | 53.5% | −17.1 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 148 | 85 | 57.4% | −10.0 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 154 | 87 | 56.5% | −15.0 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 152 | 92 | 60.5% | −9.3 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 153 | 94 | 61.4% | −7.0 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 164 | 102 | 62.2% | −10.1 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 167 | 106 | 63.5% | −4.3 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 155 | 91 | 58.7% | −3.8 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 90 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 155 | 86 | 55.5% | −10.1 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.