Zanoah
How Zanoah voted in 2022
305 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| מחל Likud | 50.49% 154 votes |
+27.1 |
| שס Shas | 19.67% 60 votes |
+11.4 |
| ט Religious Zionist Party | 15.74% 48 votes |
+4.9 |
| כן National Unity | 5.90% 18 votes |
−3.2 |
| פה Yesh Atid | 2.95% 9 votes |
−14.8 |
| ג United Torah Judaism | 2.30% 7 votes |
−3.6 |
| אמת מפלגת העבודה בראשות מרב מיכאלי | 0.33% 1 votes |
−3.4 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 3 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| ב | הבית היהודי בראשות איילת שקד | 1.31% | 4 | +0.1 |
| יז | הכלכלית החדשה בראשות פרופסור ירון זליכה | 0.66% | 2 | +0.4 |
| מרצ | מרצ השמאל של ישראל בראשות זהבה גלאון | 0.66% | 2 | −2.5 |
What happened to these votes
4 people in Zanoah voted for הבית היהודי בראשות איילת שקד. None of them elected anyone.
The list took 1.31% here, 1.1 times its national share. Nationally it stopped at 1.19%, below the 3.25% threshold, and won no seats.
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
305 voters out of 407 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has a stable position in only one election.
Zanoah against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Ahihud · Even Shemu'el · Amqa
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Ahihud | 540 |
| Even Shemu'el | 904 |
| Amqa | 452 |
| Omen | 339 |
| Azriqam | 777 |
| Qeshet | 329 |
| Pattish | 576 |
| Kefar Ya'bez | 351 |
10 elections in Zanoah
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 407 | 305 | 74.9% | +4.3 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 409 | 277 | 67.7% | +0.3 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 398 | 289 | 72.6% | +1.1 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 399 | 298 | 74.7% | +4.8 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 396 | 283 | 71.5% | +3.0 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 366 | 277 | 75.7% | +3.3 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 348 | 234 | 67.2% | −0.5 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 306 | 186 | 60.8% | −1.7 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 177 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 285 | 208 | 73.0% | +7.4 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.