Ahuzzam
How Ahuzzam voted in 2003
211 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| מחל הליכוד עם אריאל שרון לראשות הממשלה | 60.66% 128 votes |
+31.3 |
| שס שס - התאחדות הספרדים העולמית שומרי תורה | 23.70% 50 votes |
+15.5 |
| ב המפד"ל - המפלגה הדתית לאומית, המזרחי - הפועל המזרחי בארץ ישראל | 8.06% 17 votes |
+3.9 |
| ל האיחוד הלאומי ישראל ביתנו - מולדת תקומה | 2.37% 5 votes |
−3.2 |
| ם עם אחד בראשות עמיר פרץ | 1.42% 3 votes |
−1.3 |
| ג יהדות התורה והשבת אגודת ישראל - דגל התורה | 0.95% 2 votes |
−3.3 |
| אמת העבודה - מימד בראשות מצנע | 0.47% 1 votes |
−14.0 |
| יש שינוי מפלגת החילונים ומעמד הביניים | 0.47% 1 votes |
−11.8 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 3 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (1.5%), even where their share here was far larger.
| נ | ישראל אחרת כי נשבר מהפוליטיקאים | 0.95% | 2 | +0.7 |
| נץ | חרות | 0.47% | 1 | −0.7 |
| קנ | עלה ירוק | 0.47% | 1 | −0.7 |
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
213 voters out of 298 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Ahuzzam against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Qiryat Ye'arim · Dalton · Tirat Yehuda
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Qiryat Ye'arim | 974 |
| Dalton | 368 |
| Tirat Yehuda | 350 |
| נווה דקלים | 986 |
| Yaqir | 428 |
| Ahihud | 338 |
| El'azar | 361 |
| Bet Arif | 344 |
10 elections in Ahuzzam
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 404 | 291 | 72.0% | +1.4 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 401 | 289 | 72.1% | +4.6 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 396 | 277 | 69.9% | −1.6 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 397 | 295 | 74.3% | +4.4 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 391 | 277 | 70.8% | +2.4 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 368 | 270 | 73.4% | +1.0 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 350 | 227 | 64.9% | −2.9 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 339 | 242 | 71.4% | +8.9 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 220 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 298 | 213 | 71.5% | +5.9 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.