Ahuzzam
How Ahuzzam voted in 2020
277 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| מחל הליכוד בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 68.59% 190 votes |
+39.1 |
| שס התאחדות הספרדים שומרי תורה תנועתו של מרן הרב עובדיה יוסף זצ"ל | 22.74% 63 votes |
+15.1 |
| פה כחול לבן בראשות בני גנץ | 3.97% 11 votes |
−22.6 |
| אמת העבודה - גשר - מרצ | 1.44% 4 votes |
−4.4 |
| טב ימינה הימין החדש – הבית היהודי – האיחוד הלאומי | 1.44% 4 votes |
−3.8 |
| ל ישראל ביתנו בראשות אביגדור ליברמן | 0.72% 2 votes |
−5.0 |
| ג יהדות התורה והשבת אגודת ישראל - דגל התורה | 0.36% 1 votes |
−5.6 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 1 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| נץ | עוצמה יהודית בראשות איתמר בן גביר | 0.72% | 2 | +0.3 |
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
277 voters out of 396 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Ahuzzam against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Pattish · Sede Uzziyyahu · Bet Shiqma
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Pattish | 536 |
| Sede Uzziyyahu | 794 |
| Bet Shiqma | 440 |
| Avdon | 375 |
| Sede Eliyyahu | 377 |
| Zetan | 693 |
| Kefar Hoshen | 426 |
| Adderet | 408 |
10 elections in Ahuzzam
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 404 | 291 | 72.0% | +1.4 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 401 | 289 | 72.1% | +4.6 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 396 | 277 | 69.9% | −1.6 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 397 | 295 | 74.3% | +4.4 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 391 | 277 | 70.8% | +2.4 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 368 | 270 | 73.4% | +1.0 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 350 | 227 | 64.9% | −2.9 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 339 | 242 | 71.4% | +8.9 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 220 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 298 | 213 | 71.5% | +5.9 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.