Kissufim
How Kissufim voted in 2003
130 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| אמת העבודה - מימד בראשות מצנע | 75.38% 98 votes |
+60.9 |
| מרצ מרצ - הבחירה הדמוקרטית - שחר | 10.00% 13 votes |
+4.8 |
| מחל הליכוד עם אריאל שרון לראשות הממשלה | 7.69% 10 votes |
−21.7 |
| ב המפד"ל - המפלגה הדתית לאומית, המזרחי - הפועל המזרחי בארץ ישראל | 1.54% 2 votes |
−2.7 |
| יש שינוי מפלגת החילונים ומעמד הביניים | 0.77% 1 votes |
−11.5 |
| שס שס - התאחדות הספרדים העולמית שומרי תורה | 0.77% 1 votes |
−7.5 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 2 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (1.5%), even where their share here was far larger.
| קנ | עלה ירוק | 2.31% | 3 | +1.1 |
| רק | הירוקים | 1.54% | 2 | +1.1 |
What happened to these votes
3 people in Kissufim voted for עלה ירוק. None of them elected anyone.
The list took 2.31% here, 1.9 times its national share. Nationally it stopped at 1.20%, below the 1.5% threshold, and won no seats.
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
131 voters out of 239 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Kissufim against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Negba · Merhavya(Qibbuz) · Kefar Masaryk
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Negba | 332 |
| Merhavya(Qibbuz) | 364 |
| Kefar Masaryk | 382 |
| HaOgen | 375 |
| Gan Hayyim | 332 |
| Sede Warburg | 468 |
| Shoval | 327 |
| Ma'barot | 490 |
10 elections in Kissufim
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 300 | 163 | 54.3% | −16.3 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 315 | 155 | 49.2% | −18.2 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 313 | 157 | 50.2% | −21.4 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 289 | 147 | 50.9% | −19.0 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 287 | 157 | 54.7% | −13.8 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 278 | 154 | 55.4% | −16.9 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 249 | 142 | 57.0% | −10.7 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 229 | 133 | 58.1% | −4.4 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 121 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 239 | 131 | 54.8% | −10.8 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.