Kissufim
How Kissufim voted in 2020
156 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| פה כחול לבן בראשות בני גנץ | 42.95% 67 votes |
+16.4 |
| אמת העבודה - גשר - מרצ | 39.74% 62 votes |
+33.9 |
| מחל הליכוד בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 8.97% 14 votes |
−20.5 |
| טב ימינה הימין החדש – הבית היהודי – האיחוד הלאומי | 3.85% 6 votes |
−1.4 |
| ל ישראל ביתנו בראשות אביגדור ליברמן | 1.92% 3 votes |
−3.8 |
| ודעם הרשימה המשותפת חד"ש, רע"מ, תע"ל, בל"ד | 1.28% 2 votes |
−11.4 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 1 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| נץ | עוצמה יהודית בראשות איתמר בן גביר | 1.28% | 2 | +0.9 |
What happened to these votes
2 people in Kissufim voted for עוצמה יהודית בראשות איתמר בן גביר. None of them elected anyone.
The list took 1.28% here, 3.0 times its national share. Nationally it stopped at 0.42%, below the 3.25% threshold, and won no seats.
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
157 voters out of 313 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Kissufim against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Kefar Monash · Dafna · Gevim
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Kefar Monash | 461 |
| Dafna | 447 |
| Gevim | 340 |
| Gan HaShomeron | 486 |
| Shekhanya | 467 |
| Rishpon | 678 |
| Nahsholim | 395 |
| Hogla | 398 |
10 elections in Kissufim
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 300 | 163 | 54.3% | −16.3 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 315 | 155 | 49.2% | −18.2 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 313 | 157 | 50.2% | −21.4 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 289 | 147 | 50.9% | −19.0 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 287 | 157 | 54.7% | −13.8 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 278 | 154 | 55.4% | −16.9 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 249 | 142 | 57.0% | −10.7 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 229 | 133 | 58.1% | −4.4 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 121 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 239 | 131 | 54.8% | −10.8 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.