Bet Rabban
How Bet Rabban voted in 2003
94 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| ב המפד"ל - המפלגה הדתית לאומית, המזרחי - הפועל המזרחי בארץ ישראל | 40.43% 38 votes |
+36.2 |
| שס שס - התאחדות הספרדים העולמית שומרי תורה | 27.66% 26 votes |
+19.4 |
| מחל הליכוד עם אריאל שרון לראשות הממשלה | 19.15% 18 votes |
−10.2 |
| ל האיחוד הלאומי ישראל ביתנו - מולדת תקומה | 9.57% 9 votes |
+4.0 |
| ג יהדות התורה והשבת אגודת ישראל - דגל התורה | 1.06% 1 votes |
−3.2 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 2 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (1.5%), even where their share here was far larger.
| נץ | חרות | 1.06% | 1 | −0.1 |
| קנ | עלה ירוק | 1.06% | 1 | −0.1 |
What happened to these votes
1 people in Bet Rabban voted for חרות. None of them elected anyone.
The list took 1.06% here, 0.9 times its national share. Nationally it stopped at 1.15%, below the 1.5% threshold, and won no seats.
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
94 voters out of 127 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Bet Rabban against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Haspin · Newe Daniyyel · Kokhav HaShahar
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Haspin | 390 |
| Newe Daniyyel | 403 |
| Kokhav HaShahar | 458 |
| Dolev | 307 |
| Pedu'el | 338 |
| Moreshet | 332 |
| Ma'ale Mikhmas | 386 |
| Teqoa | 470 |
10 elections in Bet Rabban
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 299 | 212 | 70.9% | +0.3 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 322 | 231 | 71.7% | +4.3 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 331 | 248 | 74.9% | +3.4 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 341 | 254 | 74.5% | +4.6 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 342 | 283 | 82.7% | +14.3 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 302 | 251 | 83.1% | +10.8 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 305 | 230 | 75.4% | +7.6 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 233 | 166 | 71.2% | +8.7 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 131 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 127 | 94 | 74.0% | +8.4 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.