Bet Rabban
How Bet Rabban voted in 2022
211 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| ט Religious Zionist Party | 73.46% 155 votes |
+62.6 |
| מחל Likud | 12.32% 26 votes |
−11.1 |
| שס Shas | 10.43% 22 votes |
+2.2 |
| ג United Torah Judaism | 1.42% 3 votes |
−4.5 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 2 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| ב | הבית היהודי בראשות איילת שקד | 1.90% | 4 | +0.7 |
| קץ | באומץ בשבילך | 0.47% | 1 | +0.2 |
What happened to these votes
4 people in Bet Rabban voted for הבית היהודי בראשות איילת שקד. None of them elected anyone.
The list took 1.90% here, 1.6 times its national share. Nationally it stopped at 1.19%, below the 3.25% threshold, and won no seats.
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
212 voters out of 299 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Bet Rabban against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Ma'ale Levona · Qiryat Netafim · Yizhar
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Ma'ale Levona | 351 |
| Qiryat Netafim | 388 |
| Yizhar | 645 |
| Alumma | 531 |
| Bne Dkalim | 625 |
| Asfar | 350 |
| Mattityahu | 374 |
| Ma'ale Amos | 324 |
10 elections in Bet Rabban
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 299 | 212 | 70.9% | +0.3 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 322 | 231 | 71.7% | +4.3 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 331 | 248 | 74.9% | +3.4 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 341 | 254 | 74.5% | +4.6 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 342 | 283 | 82.7% | +14.3 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 302 | 251 | 83.1% | +10.8 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 305 | 230 | 75.4% | +7.6 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 233 | 166 | 71.2% | +8.7 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 131 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 127 | 94 | 74.0% | +8.4 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.