Sha'ar Menashe
How Sha'ar Menashe voted in 2013
10 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| אמת העבודה בראשות שלי יחימוביץ' | 20.00% 2 votes |
+8.6 |
| מחל הליכוד - ישראל ביתנו בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 20.00% 2 votes |
−3.3 |
| פה יש עתיד בראשות יאיר לפיד | 20.00% 2 votes |
+5.7 |
| שס התאחדות הספרדים העולמית שומרי תורה | 20.00% 2 votes |
+11.2 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 2 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (2.0%), even where their share here was far larger.
| ץ | עם שלם - בהכוונת הרב חיים אמסלם | 10.00% | 1 | +8.8 |
| קנ | עלה ירוק - הרשימה הליברלית | 10.00% | 1 | +8.8 |
What happened to these votes
1 people in Sha'ar Menashe voted for עם שלם - בהכוונת הרב חיים אמסלם. None of them elected anyone.
The list took 10.00% here, 8.3 times its national share. Nationally it stopped at 1.20%, below the 2.0% threshold, and won no seats.
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
11 voters out of 122 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Sha'ar Menashe against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Yehud-Monoson · Gedera · Giv'at Shemu'el
The nearest localities on the map. This locality has no others of a similar size, so the comparison is not limited by size.
| Yehud-Monoson | 15,556 |
| Gedera | 10,662 |
| Giv'at Shemu'el | 12,297 |
| Rishon LeZiyyon | 125,345 |
| Holon | 93,248 |
| Gan Yavne | 9,757 |
| Qiryat Motzkin | 21,942 |
| Qiryat Shemona | 9,878 |
10 elections in Sha'ar Menashe
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 132 | 21 | 15.9% | −54.7 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 122 | 13 | 10.7% | −56.8 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 136 | 11 | 8.1% | −63.4 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 131 | 12 | 9.2% | −60.7 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 131 | 13 | 9.9% | −58.5 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 120 | 13 | 10.8% | −61.5 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 122 | 11 | 9.0% | −58.8 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 137 | 5 | 3.6% | −58.9 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 4 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 228 | 7 | 3.1% | −62.5 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.