Sha'ar Menashe
How Sha'ar Menashe voted in 2022
20 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| מחל Likud | 35.00% 7 votes |
+11.6 |
| פה Yesh Atid | 25.00% 5 votes |
+7.2 |
| שס Shas | 20.00% 4 votes |
+11.8 |
| אמת מפלגת העבודה בראשות מרב מיכאלי | 5.00% 1 votes |
+1.3 |
| ום חד"ש תע"ל בראשות איימן עודה ואחמד טיבי | 5.00% 1 votes |
+1.2 |
| ל Yisrael Beiteinu | 5.00% 1 votes |
+0.5 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 1 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| נר | "אנחנו" - בראשות עו"ד מוש חוג`ה | 5.00% | 1 | +5.0 |
What happened to these votes
1 people in Sha'ar Menashe voted for "אנחנו" - בראשות עו"ד מוש חוג`ה. None of them elected anyone.
The list took 5.00% here, 713.3 times its national share. Nationally it stopped at 0.01%, below the 3.25% threshold, and won no seats.
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
21 voters out of 132 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Sha'ar Menashe against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Qazir · Kefar Shemaryahu · Revadim
The nearest localities on the map. This locality has no others of a similar size, so the comparison is not limited by size.
| Qazir | 1,489 |
| Kefar Shemaryahu | 1,243 |
| Revadim | 468 |
| En Wered | 877 |
| Kefar Weradim | 3,152 |
| Lehavim | 3,902 |
| Midreshet Ben Gurion | 769 |
| Meshar | 384 |
10 elections in Sha'ar Menashe
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 132 | 21 | 15.9% | −54.7 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 122 | 13 | 10.7% | −56.8 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 136 | 11 | 8.1% | −63.4 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 131 | 12 | 9.2% | −60.7 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 131 | 13 | 9.9% | −58.5 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 120 | 13 | 10.8% | −61.5 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 122 | 11 | 9.0% | −58.8 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 137 | 5 | 3.6% | −58.9 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 4 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 228 | 7 | 3.1% | −62.5 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.