Ma'ale Gilboa
How Ma'ale Gilboa voted in 2003
113 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| ב המפד"ל - המפלגה הדתית לאומית, המזרחי - הפועל המזרחי בארץ ישראל | 30.97% 35 votes |
+26.8 |
| מחל הליכוד עם אריאל שרון לראשות הממשלה | 26.55% 30 votes |
−2.8 |
| אמת העבודה - מימד בראשות מצנע | 12.39% 14 votes |
−2.1 |
| ל האיחוד הלאומי ישראל ביתנו - מולדת תקומה | 10.62% 12 votes |
+5.1 |
| מרצ מרצ - הבחירה הדמוקרטית - שחר | 7.08% 8 votes |
+1.9 |
| יש שינוי מפלגת החילונים ומעמד הביניים | 3.54% 4 votes |
−8.7 |
| כן ישראל בעליה בראשות נתן שרנסקי | 2.65% 3 votes |
+0.5 |
| ג יהדות התורה והשבת אגודת ישראל - דגל התורה | 0.88% 1 votes |
−3.4 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 3 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (1.5%), even where their share here was far larger.
| נ | ישראל אחרת כי נשבר מהפוליטיקאים | 2.65% | 3 | +2.4 |
| נץ | חרות | 1.77% | 2 | +0.6 |
| רק | הירוקים | 0.88% | 1 | +0.5 |
What happened to these votes
3 people in Ma'ale Gilboa voted for ישראל אחרת כי נשבר מהפוליטיקאים. None of them elected anyone.
The list took 2.65% here, 11.7 times its national share. Nationally it stopped at 0.23%, below the 1.5% threshold, and won no seats.
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
114 voters out of 160 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has a stable position in only one election.
Ma'ale Gilboa against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
10 elections in Ma'ale Gilboa
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 386 | 310 | 80.3% | +9.7 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 367 | 296 | 80.7% | +13.2 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 360 | 290 | 80.6% | +9.0 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 355 | 290 | 81.7% | +11.8 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 351 | 297 | 84.6% | +16.2 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 303 | 250 | 82.5% | +10.2 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 263 | 213 | 81.0% | +13.2 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 226 | 184 | 81.4% | +18.9 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 157 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 160 | 114 | 71.2% | +5.6 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.