Ma'ale Gilboa
How Ma'ale Gilboa voted in 2020
290 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| טב ימינה הימין החדש – הבית היהודי – האיחוד הלאומי | 43.45% 126 votes |
+38.2 |
| פה כחול לבן בראשות בני גנץ | 29.66% 86 votes |
+3.1 |
| מחל הליכוד בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 14.83% 43 votes |
−14.6 |
| אמת העבודה - גשר - מרצ | 8.97% 26 votes |
+3.1 |
| ג יהדות התורה והשבת אגודת ישראל - דגל התורה | 1.03% 3 votes |
−4.9 |
| שס התאחדות הספרדים שומרי תורה תנועתו של מרן הרב עובדיה יוסף זצ"ל | 0.69% 2 votes |
−7.0 |
| ודעם הרשימה המשותפת חד"ש, רע"מ, תע"ל, בל"ד | 0.34% 1 votes |
−12.3 |
| ל ישראל ביתנו בראשות אביגדור ליברמן | 0.34% 1 votes |
−5.4 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 2 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| ז | עוצמה ליברלית – כלכלית בראשות גלעד אלפר | 0.34% | 1 | +0.3 |
| ףז | הפיראטים לדמוקרטיה לחצו כאן | 0.34% | 1 | +0.3 |
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
290 voters out of 360 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has a stable position in only one election.
Ma'ale Gilboa against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Kefar Hananya · Asherat · Sede Eli'ezer
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Kefar Hananya | 383 |
| Asherat | 309 |
| Sede Eli'ezer | 457 |
| Zohar | 304 |
| Shoshannat HaAmaqim | 317 |
| Giv'at Nili | 341 |
| Nir Yisra'el | 459 |
| Gannot Hadar | 544 |
10 elections in Ma'ale Gilboa
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 386 | 310 | 80.3% | +9.7 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 367 | 296 | 80.7% | +13.2 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 360 | 290 | 80.6% | +9.0 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 355 | 290 | 81.7% | +11.8 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 351 | 297 | 84.6% | +16.2 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 303 | 250 | 82.5% | +10.2 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 263 | 213 | 81.0% | +13.2 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 226 | 184 | 81.4% | +18.9 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 157 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 160 | 114 | 71.2% | +5.6 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.