Ma'ale Gilboa
How Ma'ale Gilboa voted in 2019
290 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| טב ימינה בראשות איילת שקד הבית היהודי-האיחוד הלאומי-הימין החדש | 45.17% 131 votes |
+39.3 |
| פה כחול לבן - בראשות בני גנץ ויאיר לפיד | 23.10% 67 votes |
−2.8 |
| אמת העבודה - גשר בראשות עמיר פרץ ואורלי לוי אבקסיס | 16.90% 49 votes |
+12.1 |
| מחל הליכוד בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 11.72% 34 votes |
−13.4 |
| מרצ המחנה הדמוקרטי בהנהגת הורוביץ, שפיר וברק | 1.03% 3 votes |
−3.3 |
| שס התאחדות הספרדים שומרי התורה תנועתו של מרן הרב עובדיה יוסף זצ"ל | 0.69% 2 votes |
−6.8 |
| ודעם הרשימה המשותפת חד"ש, רע"ם, תע"ל, בל"ד | 0.34% 1 votes |
−10.3 |
| ל ישראל ביתנו בראשות אביגדור ליברמן | 0.34% 1 votes |
−6.6 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 1 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| כף | עוצמה יהודית בראשות איתמר בן גביר | 0.69% | 2 | −1.2 |
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
290 voters out of 355 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has a stable position in only one election.
Ma'ale Gilboa against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Newe Ziv · Midreshet Ben Gurion · Yotvata
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Newe Ziv | 404 |
| Midreshet Ben Gurion | 813 |
| Yotvata | 414 |
| En HaShofet | 525 |
| Sarid | 546 |
| Kefar Blum | 490 |
| Negba | 481 |
| Yas'ur | 395 |
10 elections in Ma'ale Gilboa
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 386 | 310 | 80.3% | +9.7 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 367 | 296 | 80.7% | +13.2 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 360 | 290 | 80.6% | +9.0 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 355 | 290 | 81.7% | +11.8 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 351 | 297 | 84.6% | +16.2 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 303 | 250 | 82.5% | +10.2 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 263 | 213 | 81.0% | +13.2 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 226 | 184 | 81.4% | +18.9 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 157 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 160 | 114 | 71.2% | +5.6 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.