Me Ammi
How Me Ammi voted in 2003
98 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| אמת העבודה - מימד בראשות מצנע | 33.67% 33 votes |
+19.2 |
| יש שינוי מפלגת החילונים ומעמד הביניים | 18.37% 18 votes |
+6.1 |
| מרצ מרצ - הבחירה הדמוקרטית - שחר | 18.37% 18 votes |
+13.2 |
| מחל הליכוד עם אריאל שרון לראשות הממשלה | 13.27% 13 votes |
−16.1 |
| ם עם אחד בראשות עמיר פרץ | 4.08% 4 votes |
+1.3 |
| ב המפד"ל - המפלגה הדתית לאומית, המזרחי - הפועל המזרחי בארץ ישראל | 2.04% 2 votes |
−2.2 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 2 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (1.5%), even where their share here was far larger.
| קנ | עלה ירוק | 6.12% | 6 | +4.9 |
| רק | הירוקים | 4.08% | 4 | +3.7 |
What happened to these votes
6 people in Me Ammi voted for עלה ירוק. None of them elected anyone.
The list took 6.12% here, 5.1 times its national share. Nationally it stopped at 1.20%, below the 1.5% threshold, and won no seats.
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
98 voters out of 139 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Me Ammi against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Kefar Blum · Ma'oz Hayyim · Midreshet Ben Gurion
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Kefar Blum | 349 |
| Ma'oz Hayyim | 323 |
| Midreshet Ben Gurion | 318 |
| Rishpon | 457 |
| Ma'anit | 329 |
| Ramat HaShofet | 320 |
| Kefar Szold | 309 |
| Moledet | 358 |
10 elections in Me Ammi
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 259 | 197 | 76.1% | +5.4 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 256 | 187 | 73.0% | +5.6 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 255 | 198 | 77.6% | +6.1 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 256 | 205 | 80.1% | +10.2 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 254 | 207 | 81.5% | +13.0 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 225 | 189 | 84.0% | +11.7 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 222 | 184 | 82.9% | +15.1 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 198 | 282 | 142.4% | +79.9 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 114 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 139 | 98 | 70.5% | +4.9 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.