Me Ammi
How Me Ammi voted in 2015
188 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| אמת המחנה הציוני בראשות יצחק הרצוג וציפי לבני | 55.32% 104 votes |
+36.6 |
| מרצ השמאל של ישראל | 19.15% 36 votes |
+15.2 |
| פה יש עתיד בראשות יאיר לפיד | 12.23% 23 votes |
+3.4 |
| כ כולנו בראשות משה כחלון | 6.91% 13 votes |
−0.6 |
| מחל הליכוד בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 3.72% 7 votes |
−19.7 |
| ודעם הרשימה המשותפת (חד"ש, רע"מ, בל"ד, תע"ל) | 0.53% 1 votes |
−10.1 |
| טב הבית היהודי בראשות נפתלי בנט | 0.53% 1 votes |
−6.2 |
| שס התאחדות הספרדים שומרי תורה תנועתו של מרן הרב עובדיה יוסף זצ"ל | 0.53% 1 votes |
−5.2 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 2 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| קנ | עלה ירוק - גאה בבחירה שלי | 0.53% | 1 | −0.6 |
| קץ | יחד — העם איתנו בראשות אלי ישי | 0.53% | 1 | −2.4 |
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
189 voters out of 225 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Me Ammi against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Sedot Yam · Ayyelet HaShahar · Ginnegar
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Sedot Yam | 518 |
| Ayyelet HaShahar | 718 |
| Ginnegar | 381 |
| Yodefat | 373 |
| Kefar Harif | 450 |
| Bet Alfa | 489 |
| Kefar Azza | 509 |
| En Yahav | 381 |
10 elections in Me Ammi
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 259 | 197 | 76.1% | +5.4 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 256 | 187 | 73.0% | +5.6 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 255 | 198 | 77.6% | +6.1 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 256 | 205 | 80.1% | +10.2 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 254 | 207 | 81.5% | +13.0 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 225 | 189 | 84.0% | +11.7 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 222 | 184 | 82.9% | +15.1 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 198 | 282 | 142.4% | +79.9 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 114 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 139 | 98 | 70.5% | +4.9 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.