Me Ammi
How Me Ammi voted in 2020
196 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| פה כחול לבן בראשות בני גנץ | 56.63% 111 votes |
+30.0 |
| אמת העבודה - גשר - מרצ | 31.12% 61 votes |
+25.3 |
| מחל הליכוד בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 4.59% 9 votes |
−24.9 |
| ודעם הרשימה המשותפת חד"ש, רע"מ, תע"ל, בל"ד | 4.08% 8 votes |
−8.6 |
| טב ימינה הימין החדש – הבית היהודי – האיחוד הלאומי | 1.02% 2 votes |
−4.2 |
| ל ישראל ביתנו בראשות אביגדור ליברמן | 1.02% 2 votes |
−4.7 |
| ג יהדות התורה והשבת אגודת ישראל - דגל התורה | 0.51% 1 votes |
−5.5 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 2 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| ז | עוצמה ליברלית – כלכלית בראשות גלעד אלפר | 0.51% | 1 | +0.4 |
| נ | קול הנשים | 0.51% | 1 | +0.4 |
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
198 voters out of 255 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Me Ammi against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Ramat HaKovesh · Ma'oz Hayyim · Atsmon Segev
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Ramat HaKovesh | 532 |
| Ma'oz Hayyim | 300 |
| Atsmon Segev | 663 |
| Ga'ton | 375 |
| En Gedi | 313 |
| Afeq | 385 |
| Sarigim (Li-On) | 566 |
| Mikhmoret | 690 |
10 elections in Me Ammi
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 259 | 197 | 76.1% | +5.4 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 256 | 187 | 73.0% | +5.6 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 255 | 198 | 77.6% | +6.1 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 256 | 205 | 80.1% | +10.2 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 254 | 207 | 81.5% | +13.0 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 225 | 189 | 84.0% | +11.7 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 222 | 184 | 82.9% | +15.1 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 198 | 282 | 142.4% | +79.9 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 114 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 139 | 98 | 70.5% | +4.9 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.