Umm Al-Qutuf
Also recorded by the Central Elections Committee as אום אלקוטוף
How Umm Al-Qutuf voted in 2019
362 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| ום חד"ש תע"ל בראשות איימן עודה ואחמד טיבי | 31.22% 113 votes |
+26.7 |
| דעם רע"ם-בל"ד הרשימה הערבית המאוחדת ברית לאומית דמוקרטית | 29.56% 107 votes |
+26.2 |
| מרצ מרצ- השמאל של ישראל | 21.55% 78 votes |
+17.9 |
| שס התאחדות הספרדים שומרי התורה תנועתו של מרן הרב עובדיה יוסף זצ"ל | 10.77% 39 votes |
+4.8 |
| פה כחול לבן בראשות בני גנץ ויאיר לפיד | 4.70% 17 votes |
−21.4 |
| אמת מפלגת העבודה בראשות אבי גבאי | 0.83% 3 votes |
−3.6 |
| מחל הליכוד בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 0.83% 3 votes |
−25.6 |
| טב איחוד מפלגות הימין הבית היהודי-האיחוד הלאומי- עוצמה יהודית | 0.28% 1 votes |
−3.4 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 1 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| נ | הימין החדש בראשות שקד ובנט | 0.28% | 1 | −2.9 |
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
363 voters out of 693 eligible.
The line is the locality's path across the elections; the filled dot is the latest.
The position is derived from locality-level results and describes a place, not people. Movement on the map does not show that particular voters changed their vote.
Umm Al-Qutuf against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Umm Batin · Shibli-Umm Al-Ghanam · Sallama
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Umm Batin | 634 |
| Shibli-Umm Al-Ghanam | 1,593 |
| Sallama | 961 |
| Kafar Bara | 1,471 |
| Ka'abiyye-Tabbash-Hajajre | 1,525 |
| Ilut | 1,410 |
| Ein Naqquba | 675 |
| Tuba-Zangariyye | 1,293 |
10 elections in Umm Al-Qutuf
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 784 | 454 | 57.9% | −12.7 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 744 | 381 | 51.2% | −16.2 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 717 | 580 | 80.9% | +9.4 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 708 | 510 | 72.0% | +2.2 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 693 | 363 | 52.4% | −16.1 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 626 | 520 | 83.1% | +10.7 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 570 | 312 | 54.7% | −13.0 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 499 | 298 | 59.7% | −2.8 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 229 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 434 | 294 | 67.7% | +2.1 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.