Umm Al-Qutuf
Also recorded by the Central Elections Committee as אום אלקוטוף
How Umm Al-Qutuf voted in 2021
376 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| ודעם הרשימה המשותפת (חד"ש, תע"ל, בל"ד) | 44.41% 167 votes |
+39.6 |
| עם הרשימה הערבית המאוחדת | 35.11% 132 votes |
+31.3 |
| מרצ מרצ – השמאל של ישראל | 9.57% 36 votes |
+5.0 |
| שס התאחדות הספרדים שומרי תורה תנועתו של מרן הרב עובדיה יוסף זצ"ל | 5.59% 21 votes |
−1.6 |
| מחל הליכוד בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 3.19% 12 votes |
−21.0 |
| אמת מפלגת העבודה בראשות מרב מיכאלי | 0.53% 2 votes |
−5.6 |
| ל ישראל ביתנו בראשות אביגדור ליברמן | 0.53% 2 votes |
−5.1 |
| פה יש עתיד בראשות יאיר לפיד | 0.53% 2 votes |
−13.4 |
| ב ימינה בראשות נפתלי בנט | 0.27% 1 votes |
−5.9 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 1 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| ר | רפא – רק בריאות בראשות דוקטור אריה אבני | 0.27% | 1 | −0.1 |
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
381 voters out of 744 eligible.
The line is the locality's path across the elections; the filled dot is the latest.
The position is derived from locality-level results and describes a place, not people. Movement on the map does not show that particular voters changed their vote.
Umm Al-Qutuf against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Qasr A-Sir · Meiser · Abu Rubay'a
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Qasr A-Sir | 832 |
| Meiser | 448 |
| Abu Rubay'a | 966 |
| Tamra (Yizre'el) | 445 |
| Ibtin | 653 |
| Al Sayyid | 804 |
| Na'ura | 600 |
| Ilut | 1,714 |
10 elections in Umm Al-Qutuf
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 784 | 454 | 57.9% | −12.7 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 744 | 381 | 51.2% | −16.2 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 717 | 580 | 80.9% | +9.4 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 708 | 510 | 72.0% | +2.2 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 693 | 363 | 52.4% | −16.1 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 626 | 520 | 83.1% | +10.7 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 570 | 312 | 54.7% | −13.0 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 499 | 298 | 59.7% | −2.8 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 229 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 434 | 294 | 67.7% | +2.1 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.