Umm Al-Qutuf
Also recorded by the Central Elections Committee as אום אלקוטוף
How Umm Al-Qutuf voted in 2022
446 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| עם Ra'am | 33.86% 151 votes |
+29.8 |
| ום חד"ש תע"ל בראשות איימן עודה ואחמד טיבי | 23.54% 105 votes |
+19.8 |
| כן National Unity | 0.45% 2 votes |
−8.6 |
| מחל Likud | 0.45% 2 votes |
−23.0 |
| אמת מפלגת העבודה בראשות מרב מיכאלי | 0.22% 1 votes |
−3.5 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 3 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| ד | בל"ד - אלתג`מוע אלווטני אלדמוקרטי בראשות סמי אבו ש | 38.57% | 172 | +35.7 |
| מרצ | מרצ השמאל של ישראל בראשות זהבה גלאון | 2.69% | 12 | −0.5 |
| קץ | באומץ בשבילך | 0.22% | 1 | −0.1 |
What happened to these votes
172 people in Umm Al-Qutuf voted for בל"ד - אלתג`מוע אלווטני אלדמוקרטי בראשות סמי אבו ש. None of them elected anyone.
The list took 38.57% here, 13.3 times its national share. Nationally it stopped at 2.91%, below the 3.25% threshold, and won no seats.
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
454 voters out of 784 eligible.
The line is the locality's path across the elections; the filled dot is the latest.
The position is derived from locality-level results and describes a place, not people. Movement on the map does not show that particular voters changed their vote.
Umm Al-Qutuf against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Uzeir | 1,080 |
| Na'ura | 850 |
| Hamam | 592 |
| Tamra (Yizre'el) | 498 |
| Muqeible | 1,112 |
| Hussniyya | 321 |
| Kabbu'a | 340 |
| Kafar Bara | 1,656 |
10 elections in Umm Al-Qutuf
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 784 | 454 | 57.9% | −12.7 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 744 | 381 | 51.2% | −16.2 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 717 | 580 | 80.9% | +9.4 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 708 | 510 | 72.0% | +2.2 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 693 | 363 | 52.4% | −16.1 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 626 | 520 | 83.1% | +10.7 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 570 | 312 | 54.7% | −13.0 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 499 | 298 | 59.7% | −2.8 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 229 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 434 | 294 | 67.7% | +2.1 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.