Peqi'in Hadasha
How Peqi'in Hadasha voted in 2022
281 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| מחל Likud | 48.04% 135 votes |
+24.6 |
| שס Shas | 27.40% 77 votes |
+19.2 |
| ט Religious Zionist Party | 14.59% 41 votes |
+3.8 |
| כן National Unity | 3.20% 9 votes |
−5.9 |
| פה Yesh Atid | 2.49% 7 votes |
−15.3 |
| אמת מפלגת העבודה בראשות מרב מיכאלי | 1.42% 4 votes |
−2.3 |
| ג United Torah Judaism | 1.07% 3 votes |
−4.8 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 3 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| ב | הבית היהודי בראשות איילת שקד | 0.71% | 2 | −0.5 |
| יז | הכלכלית החדשה בראשות פרופסור ירון זליכה | 0.71% | 2 | +0.4 |
| מרצ | מרצ השמאל של ישראל בראשות זהבה גלאון | 0.36% | 1 | −2.8 |
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
282 voters out of 355 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Peqi'in Hadasha against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Zanoah · Amqa · Even Shemu'el
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Zanoah | 305 |
| Amqa | 452 |
| Even Shemu'el | 904 |
| Ahihud | 540 |
| Newe Daniyyel | 1,154 |
| Bitha | 515 |
| Azriqam | 777 |
| Omen | 339 |
10 elections in Peqi'in Hadasha
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 355 | 282 | 79.4% | +8.8 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 336 | 256 | 76.2% | +8.7 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 323 | 270 | 83.6% | +12.1 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 325 | 259 | 79.7% | +9.8 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 317 | 250 | 78.9% | +10.4 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 281 | 207 | 73.7% | +1.3 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 256 | 169 | 66.0% | −1.8 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 245 | 171 | 69.8% | +7.3 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 140 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 183 | 146 | 79.8% | +14.2 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.