Gittit
How Gittit voted in 2022
191 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| ט Religious Zionist Party | 52.88% 101 votes |
+42.0 |
| מחל Likud | 20.42% 39 votes |
−3.0 |
| כן National Unity | 6.81% 13 votes |
−2.3 |
| פה Yesh Atid | 4.71% 9 votes |
−13.1 |
| אמת מפלגת העבודה בראשות מרב מיכאלי | 3.14% 6 votes |
−0.6 |
| ל Yisrael Beiteinu | 1.57% 3 votes |
−2.9 |
| שס Shas | 0.52% 1 votes |
−7.7 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 2 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| ב | הבית היהודי בראשות איילת שקד | 8.90% | 17 | +7.7 |
| נץ | העצמאים החדשים בראשות יורם מועלמי | 1.05% | 2 | +1.0 |
What happened to these votes
17 people in Gittit voted for הבית היהודי בראשות איילת שקד. None of them elected anyone.
The list took 8.90% here, 7.5 times its national share. Nationally it stopped at 1.19%, below the 3.25% threshold, and won no seats.
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
191 voters out of 253 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Gittit against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Netiv HaShayyara · Kefar Hittim · Rannen
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Netiv HaShayyara | 309 |
| Kefar Hittim | 346 |
| Rannen | 344 |
| Talme Yehi'el | 462 |
| Zetan | 673 |
| Ganne Yohanan | 391 |
| Bene Darom | 441 |
| Bet Uzzi'el | 367 |
10 elections in Gittit
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 253 | 191 | 75.5% | +4.9 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 246 | 190 | 77.2% | +9.8 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 241 | 195 | 80.9% | +9.4 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 242 | 194 | 80.2% | +10.3 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 241 | 192 | 79.7% | +11.2 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 187 | 150 | 80.2% | +7.9 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 167 | 122 | 73.1% | +5.3 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 155 | 113 | 72.9% | +10.4 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 100 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 93 | 52 | 55.9% | −9.7 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.