Giv'at Oz
How Giv'at Oz voted in 2009
264 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| כן קדימה – עם ציפי לבני לראשות הממשלה | 36.74% 97 votes |
+14.3 |
| מרצ התנועה החדשה מרצ | 29.17% 77 votes |
+26.2 |
| אמת העבודה בראשות אהוד ברק | 19.32% 51 votes |
+9.4 |
| מחל הליכוד – אח"י בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 6.44% 17 votes |
−15.2 |
| ל ישראל ביתנו בראשות אביגדור ליברמן | 4.17% 11 votes |
−7.5 |
| שס התאחדות הספרדים העולמית שומרי תורה | 1.52% 4 votes |
−7.0 |
| ב הבית היהודי – מפדל החדשה | 1.14% 3 votes |
−1.7 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 3 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (2.0%), even where their share here was far larger.
| קנ | עלה ירוק | 0.76% | 2 | +0.4 |
| צי | צבר – מפלגת הצעירים של ישראל | 0.38% | 1 | +0.2 |
| ק | דעם – מפלגת פועלים בראשות אסמא אגבארייה זחאלקה | 0.38% | 1 | +0.3 |
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
265 voters out of 372 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Giv'at Oz against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Karme Yosef · Ramot HaShavim · Kefar HaNagid
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Karme Yosef | 1,060 |
| Ramot HaShavim | 690 |
| Kefar HaNagid | 512 |
| Lakhish | 332 |
| Me'ona | 344 |
| Ben Ammi | 368 |
| Hofit | 512 |
| Shamir | 393 |
10 elections in Giv'at Oz
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 409 | 255 | 62.3% | −8.3 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 398 | 247 | 62.1% | −5.4 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 401 | 257 | 64.1% | −7.4 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 406 | 272 | 67.0% | −2.9 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 410 | 279 | 68.0% | −0.4 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 398 | 269 | 67.6% | −4.8 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 407 | 270 | 66.3% | −1.4 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 372 | 265 | 71.2% | +8.7 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 242 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 374 | 253 | 67.6% | +2.0 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.