Giv'at Oz
How Giv'at Oz voted in 2020
256 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| פה כחול לבן בראשות בני גנץ | 57.42% 147 votes |
+30.8 |
| אמת העבודה - גשר - מרצ | 28.52% 73 votes |
+22.7 |
| מחל הליכוד בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 6.25% 16 votes |
−23.2 |
| טב ימינה הימין החדש – הבית היהודי – האיחוד הלאומי | 3.91% 10 votes |
−1.3 |
| ל ישראל ביתנו בראשות אביגדור ליברמן | 2.34% 6 votes |
−3.4 |
| שס התאחדות הספרדים שומרי תורה תנועתו של מרן הרב עובדיה יוסף זצ"ל | 0.78% 2 votes |
−6.9 |
| ודעם הרשימה המשותפת חד"ש, רע"מ, תע"ל, בל"ד | 0.39% 1 votes |
−12.3 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 1 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| ז | עוצמה ליברלית – כלכלית בראשות גלעד אלפר | 0.39% | 1 | +0.3 |
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
257 voters out of 401 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Giv'at Oz against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Kefar Gil'adi · Bet Hanan · Allonim
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Kefar Gil'adi | 359 |
| Bet Hanan | 402 |
| Allonim | 375 |
| En Karmel | 405 |
| En Iron | 319 |
| Bene Atarot | 510 |
| Kefar Sirkin | 777 |
| Gevat | 551 |
10 elections in Giv'at Oz
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 409 | 255 | 62.3% | −8.3 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 398 | 247 | 62.1% | −5.4 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 401 | 257 | 64.1% | −7.4 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 406 | 272 | 67.0% | −2.9 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 410 | 279 | 68.0% | −0.4 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 398 | 269 | 67.6% | −4.8 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 407 | 270 | 66.3% | −1.4 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 372 | 265 | 71.2% | +8.7 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 242 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 374 | 253 | 67.6% | +2.0 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.