Giv'at Oz
How Giv'at Oz voted in 2019
271 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| פה כחול לבן - בראשות בני גנץ ויאיר לפיד | 50.18% 136 votes |
+24.2 |
| מרצ המחנה הדמוקרטי בהנהגת הורוביץ, שפיר וברק | 19.56% 53 votes |
+15.2 |
| אמת העבודה - גשר בראשות עמיר פרץ ואורלי לוי אבקסיס | 14.76% 40 votes |
+10.0 |
| מחל הליכוד בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 7.38% 20 votes |
−17.7 |
| ל ישראל ביתנו בראשות אביגדור ליברמן | 3.69% 10 votes |
−3.3 |
| טב ימינה בראשות איילת שקד הבית היהודי-האיחוד הלאומי-הימין החדש | 3.32% 9 votes |
−2.6 |
| ג יהדות התורה והשבת אגודת ישראל - דגל התורה | 0.37% 1 votes |
−5.7 |
| ודעם הרשימה המשותפת חד"ש, רע"ם, תע"ל, בל"ד | 0.37% 1 votes |
−10.2 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 1 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| ףז | הפיראטים - כי כולנו באותה סירה והכל אותו שייט | 0.37% | 1 | +0.3 |
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
272 voters out of 406 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Giv'at Oz against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Shamerat · Kefar Masaryk · Mizra
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Shamerat | 313 |
| Kefar Masaryk | 389 |
| Mizra | 487 |
| Hofit | 521 |
| Kammon | 391 |
| Lavon | 325 |
| En Gedi | 318 |
| Mishmar HaEmeq | 719 |
10 elections in Giv'at Oz
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 409 | 255 | 62.3% | −8.3 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 398 | 247 | 62.1% | −5.4 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 401 | 257 | 64.1% | −7.4 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 406 | 272 | 67.0% | −2.9 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 410 | 279 | 68.0% | −0.4 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 398 | 269 | 67.6% | −4.8 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 407 | 270 | 66.3% | −1.4 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 372 | 265 | 71.2% | +8.7 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 242 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 374 | 253 | 67.6% | +2.0 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.