Re'im
How Re'im voted in 2003
211 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| אמת העבודה - מימד בראשות מצנע | 51.66% 109 votes |
+37.2 |
| מרצ מרצ - הבחירה הדמוקרטית - שחר | 24.64% 52 votes |
+19.4 |
| יש שינוי מפלגת החילונים ומעמד הביניים | 11.37% 24 votes |
−0.9 |
| מחל הליכוד עם אריאל שרון לראשות הממשלה | 5.21% 11 votes |
−24.2 |
| ם עם אחד בראשות עמיר פרץ | 1.90% 4 votes |
−0.9 |
| כן ישראל בעליה בראשות נתן שרנסקי | 0.95% 2 votes |
−1.2 |
| ו החזית הדמוקרטית לשלום ולשוויון (המפלגה הקומוניסטית הישראלית וחוגי ציבור יהודים וערבים) והתנועה הערבית להתחדשות | 0.47% 1 votes |
−2.5 |
| ל האיחוד הלאומי ישראל ביתנו - מולדת תקומה | 0.47% 1 votes |
−5.1 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 2 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (1.5%), even where their share here was far larger.
| קנ | עלה ירוק | 2.84% | 6 | +1.6 |
| רק | הירוקים | 0.47% | 1 | +0.1 |
What happened to these votes
6 people in Re'im voted for עלה ירוק. None of them elected anyone.
The list took 2.84% here, 2.4 times its national share. Nationally it stopped at 1.20%, below the 1.5% threshold, and won no seats.
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
212 voters out of 290 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Re'im against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
10 elections in Re'im
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 387 | 282 | 72.9% | +2.2 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 376 | 277 | 73.7% | +6.2 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 358 | 251 | 70.1% | −1.4 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 362 | 255 | 70.4% | +0.6 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 366 | 273 | 74.6% | +6.1 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 348 | 279 | 80.2% | +7.8 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 330 | 252 | 76.4% | +8.6 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 324 | 234 | 72.2% | +9.7 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 220 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 290 | 212 | 73.1% | +7.5 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.