Re'im
How Re'im voted in 2015
279 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| אמת המחנה הציוני בראשות יצחק הרצוג וציפי לבני | 70.97% 198 votes |
+52.3 |
| מרצ השמאל של ישראל | 10.75% 30 votes |
+6.8 |
| פה יש עתיד בראשות יאיר לפיד | 7.89% 22 votes |
−0.9 |
| מחל הליכוד בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 3.94% 11 votes |
−19.5 |
| כ כולנו בראשות משה כחלון | 2.51% 7 votes |
−5.0 |
| טב הבית היהודי בראשות נפתלי בנט | 1.08% 3 votes |
−5.7 |
| ל ישראל ביתנו בראשות אביגדור ליברמן | 1.08% 3 votes |
−4.0 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 1 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| קנ | עלה ירוק - גאה בבחירה שלי | 1.79% | 5 | +0.7 |
What happened to these votes
5 people in Re'im voted for עלה ירוק - גאה בבחירה שלי. None of them elected anyone.
The list took 1.79% here, 1.6 times its national share. Nationally it stopped at 1.12%, below the 3.25% threshold, and won no seats.
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
279 voters out of 348 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Re'im against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Qoranit · Allon HaGalil · Nahsholim
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Qoranit | 444 |
| Allon HaGalil | 553 |
| Nahsholim | 407 |
| Gevat | 535 |
| Deganya Alef | 366 |
| Erez | 302 |
| Mishmar HaNegev | 490 |
| Allonim | 403 |
10 elections in Re'im
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 387 | 282 | 72.9% | +2.2 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 376 | 277 | 73.7% | +6.2 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 358 | 251 | 70.1% | −1.4 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 362 | 255 | 70.4% | +0.6 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 366 | 273 | 74.6% | +6.1 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 348 | 279 | 80.2% | +7.8 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 330 | 252 | 76.4% | +8.6 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 324 | 234 | 72.2% | +9.7 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 220 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 290 | 212 | 73.1% | +7.5 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.