Re'im
How Re'im voted in 2009
234 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| אמת העבודה בראשות אהוד ברק | 42.31% 99 votes |
+32.4 |
| כן קדימה – עם ציפי לבני לראשות הממשלה | 37.61% 88 votes |
+15.1 |
| מרצ התנועה החדשה מרצ | 11.54% 27 votes |
+8.6 |
| מחל הליכוד – אח"י בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 3.42% 8 votes |
−18.2 |
| ל ישראל ביתנו בראשות אביגדור ליברמן | 2.56% 6 votes |
−9.1 |
| ו חד"ש החזית הדמוקרטית לשלום ושיוויון (המפלגה הקומוניסטית הישראלית וחוגי ציבור ערבים ויהודים) | 0.43% 1 votes |
−2.9 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 4 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (2.0%), even where their share here was far larger.
| קנ | עלה ירוק | 0.85% | 2 | +0.5 |
| ה | התנועה היירוקה מימד בראשות הרב מלכיאור וערן בן-ימיני | 0.43% | 1 | −0.4 |
| חי | ישראל חזקה בראשות ד"ר אפרים סנה | 0.43% | 1 | +0.2 |
| רק | הירוקים – למען ישראל ירוקה | 0.43% | 1 | +0.1 |
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
234 voters out of 324 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Re'im against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Negba · Gan Shemu'el · Mishmar HaNegev
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Negba | 337 |
| Gan Shemu'el | 607 |
| Mishmar HaNegev | 392 |
| Hanita | 331 |
| Gazit | 408 |
| En HaHoresh | 507 |
| HaZorea | 580 |
| Bet Alfa | 356 |
10 elections in Re'im
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 387 | 282 | 72.9% | +2.2 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 376 | 277 | 73.7% | +6.2 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 358 | 251 | 70.1% | −1.4 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 362 | 255 | 70.4% | +0.6 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 366 | 273 | 74.6% | +6.1 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 348 | 279 | 80.2% | +7.8 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 330 | 252 | 76.4% | +8.6 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 324 | 234 | 72.2% | +9.7 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 220 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 290 | 212 | 73.1% | +7.5 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.