Nahal Oz
How Nahal Oz voted in 2015
222 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| אמת המחנה הציוני בראשות יצחק הרצוג וציפי לבני | 56.76% 126 votes |
+38.1 |
| פה יש עתיד בראשות יאיר לפיד | 16.22% 36 votes |
+7.4 |
| מרצ השמאל של ישראל | 9.46% 21 votes |
+5.5 |
| מחל הליכוד בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 4.95% 11 votes |
−18.4 |
| כ כולנו בראשות משה כחלון | 4.50% 10 votes |
−3.0 |
| טב הבית היהודי בראשות נפתלי בנט | 2.70% 6 votes |
−4.0 |
| ל ישראל ביתנו בראשות אביגדור ליברמן | 0.90% 2 votes |
−4.2 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 1 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| קנ | עלה ירוק - גאה בבחירה שלי | 4.50% | 10 | +3.4 |
What happened to these votes
10 people in Nahal Oz voted for עלה ירוק - גאה בבחירה שלי. None of them elected anyone.
The list took 4.50% here, 4.0 times its national share. Nationally it stopped at 1.12%, below the 3.25% threshold, and won no seats.
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
222 voters out of 315 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Nahal Oz against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Shilat · Kefar HaHoresh · Reshafim
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Shilat | 351 |
| Kefar HaHoresh | 331 |
| Reshafim | 310 |
| Deganya Bet | 404 |
| Allonim | 403 |
| Nahsholim | 407 |
| Erez | 302 |
| Qoranit | 444 |
10 elections in Nahal Oz
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 355 | 251 | 70.7% | +0.1 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 350 | 236 | 67.4% | −0.0 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 352 | 251 | 71.3% | −0.2 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 345 | 236 | 68.4% | −1.5 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 341 | 245 | 71.8% | +3.4 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 315 | 222 | 70.5% | −1.9 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 334 | 230 | 68.9% | +1.1 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 284 | 179 | 63.0% | +0.5 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 172 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 265 | 171 | 64.5% | −1.1 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.