Nahal Oz
How Nahal Oz voted in 2019
233 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| פה כחול לבן - בראשות בני גנץ ויאיר לפיד | 48.50% 113 votes |
+22.6 |
| אמת העבודה - גשר בראשות עמיר פרץ ואורלי לוי אבקסיס | 29.61% 69 votes |
+24.8 |
| מרצ המחנה הדמוקרטי בהנהגת הורוביץ, שפיר וברק | 9.44% 22 votes |
+5.1 |
| מחל הליכוד בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 5.58% 13 votes |
−19.5 |
| ל ישראל ביתנו בראשות אביגדור ליברמן | 3.86% 9 votes |
−3.1 |
| טב ימינה בראשות איילת שקד הבית היהודי-האיחוד הלאומי-הימין החדש | 1.29% 3 votes |
−4.6 |
| שס התאחדות הספרדים שומרי התורה תנועתו של מרן הרב עובדיה יוסף זצ"ל | 0.43% 1 votes |
−7.0 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 2 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| זץ | צומת - התיישבות וחקלאות | 0.86% | 2 | +0.5 |
| זכ | מפלגת הדמוקראטורה | 0.43% | 1 | +0.4 |
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
236 voters out of 345 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Nahal Oz against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Kinneret(Qevuza) · Bahan · Ashdot Ya'aqov(Ihud)
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Kinneret(Qevuza) | 439 |
| Bahan | 448 |
| Ashdot Ya'aqov(Ihud) | 476 |
| Zova | 402 |
| Yehi'am | 365 |
| Mishmar HaNegev | 523 |
| Sede Nehemya | 575 |
| Ruhama | 347 |
10 elections in Nahal Oz
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 355 | 251 | 70.7% | +0.1 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 350 | 236 | 67.4% | −0.0 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 352 | 251 | 71.3% | −0.2 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 345 | 236 | 68.4% | −1.5 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 341 | 245 | 71.8% | +3.4 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 315 | 222 | 70.5% | −1.9 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 334 | 230 | 68.9% | +1.1 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 284 | 179 | 63.0% | +0.5 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 172 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 265 | 171 | 64.5% | −1.1 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.