Nahal Oz
How Nahal Oz voted in 2022
250 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| פה Yesh Atid | 36.00% 90 votes |
+18.2 |
| כן National Unity | 21.60% 54 votes |
+12.5 |
| אמת מפלגת העבודה בראשות מרב מיכאלי | 20.00% 50 votes |
+16.3 |
| מחל Likud | 10.40% 26 votes |
−13.0 |
| ט Religious Zionist Party | 3.20% 8 votes |
−7.6 |
| ל Yisrael Beiteinu | 0.80% 2 votes |
−3.7 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 3 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| מרצ | מרצ השמאל של ישראל בראשות זהבה גלאון | 5.60% | 14 | +2.4 |
| קץ | באומץ בשבילך | 1.60% | 4 | +1.3 |
| יז | הכלכלית החדשה בראשות פרופסור ירון זליכה | 0.80% | 2 | +0.5 |
What happened to these votes
14 people in Nahal Oz voted for מרצ השמאל של ישראל בראשות זהבה גלאון. None of them elected anyone.
The list took 5.60% here, 1.8 times its national share. Nationally it stopped at 3.16%, below the 3.25% threshold, and won no seats.
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
251 voters out of 355 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Nahal Oz against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Gat(Qibbuz) · Ramat Dawid · Bet HaEmeq
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Gat(Qibbuz) | 437 |
| Ramat Dawid | 305 |
| Bet HaEmeq | 371 |
| Lahav | 378 |
| Qoranit | 468 |
| Nahalal | 618 |
| Shamir | 488 |
| Yizre'el | 352 |
10 elections in Nahal Oz
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 355 | 251 | 70.7% | +0.1 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 350 | 236 | 67.4% | −0.0 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 352 | 251 | 71.3% | −0.2 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 345 | 236 | 68.4% | −1.5 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 341 | 245 | 71.8% | +3.4 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 315 | 222 | 70.5% | −1.9 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 334 | 230 | 68.9% | +1.1 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 284 | 179 | 63.0% | +0.5 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 172 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 265 | 171 | 64.5% | −1.1 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.