Kerem Shalom
How Kerem Shalom voted in 2009
28 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| כן קדימה – עם ציפי לבני לראשות הממשלה | 32.14% 9 votes |
+9.7 |
| ל ישראל ביתנו בראשות אביגדור ליברמן | 21.43% 6 votes |
+9.7 |
| מרצ התנועה החדשה מרצ | 14.29% 4 votes |
+11.3 |
| אמת העבודה בראשות אהוד ברק | 10.71% 3 votes |
+0.8 |
| ט האיחוד הלאומי – תקומה, התקווה, ארץ ישראל שלנו, מולדת | 7.14% 2 votes |
+3.8 |
| מחל הליכוד – אח"י בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 7.14% 2 votes |
−14.5 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 1 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (2.0%), even where their share here was far larger.
| קנ | עלה ירוק | 7.14% | 2 | +6.8 |
What happened to these votes
2 people in Kerem Shalom voted for עלה ירוק. None of them elected anyone.
The list took 7.14% here, 18.3 times its national share. Nationally it stopped at 0.39%, below the 2.0% threshold, and won no seats.
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
28 voters out of 76 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Kerem Shalom against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Ben Ammi · Yotvata · Gan Hayyim
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 15 times the number of valid votes).
| Ben Ammi | 368 |
| Yotvata | 361 |
| Gan Hayyim | 391 |
| Megiddo | 331 |
| Kinneret(Qevuza) | 392 |
| Maggal | 403 |
| HaSolelim | 410 |
| Merhavya(Qibbuz) | 408 |
9 elections in Kerem Shalom
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 153 | 89 | 58.2% | −12.5 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 151 | 75 | 49.7% | −17.8 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 145 | 82 | 56.6% | −15.0 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 136 | 69 | 50.7% | −19.1 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 126 | 68 | 54.0% | −14.5 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 95 | 48 | 50.5% | −21.8 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 87 | 38 | 43.7% | −24.1 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 76 | 28 | 36.8% | −25.7 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 29 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.