Kerem Shalom
How Kerem Shalom voted in 2022
89 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| ט Religious Zionist Party | 41.57% 37 votes |
+30.7 |
| פה Yesh Atid | 19.10% 17 votes |
+1.3 |
| מחל Likud | 16.85% 15 votes |
−6.6 |
| כן National Unity | 10.11% 9 votes |
+1.0 |
| אמת מפלגת העבודה בראשות מרב מיכאלי | 6.74% 6 votes |
+3.0 |
| ל Yisrael Beiteinu | 1.12% 1 votes |
−3.4 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 1 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| מרצ | מרצ השמאל של ישראל בראשות זהבה גלאון | 4.49% | 4 | +1.3 |
What happened to these votes
4 people in Kerem Shalom voted for מרצ השמאל של ישראל בראשות זהבה גלאון. None of them elected anyone.
The list took 4.49% here, 1.4 times its national share. Nationally it stopped at 3.16%, below the 3.25% threshold, and won no seats.
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
89 voters out of 153 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Kerem Shalom against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Bet She'arim · Nahsholim · Gan Shelomo
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Bet She'arim | 392 |
| Nahsholim | 414 |
| Gan Shelomo | 320 |
| Yas'ur | 406 |
| Nizzanim | 355 |
| Hefzi-Bah | 409 |
| Netiv HaLamed-He | 370 |
| Sharona | 332 |
9 elections in Kerem Shalom
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 153 | 89 | 58.2% | −12.5 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 151 | 75 | 49.7% | −17.8 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 145 | 82 | 56.6% | −15.0 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 136 | 69 | 50.7% | −19.1 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 126 | 68 | 54.0% | −14.5 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 95 | 48 | 50.5% | −21.8 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 87 | 38 | 43.7% | −24.1 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 76 | 28 | 36.8% | −25.7 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 29 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.