Kerem Shalom
How Kerem Shalom voted in 2013
36 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| אמת העבודה בראשות שלי יחימוביץ' | 36.11% 13 votes |
+24.7 |
| טב הבית היהודי בראשות נפתלי בנט - מיסודם של האיחוד הלאומי, המפד"ל החדשה | 19.44% 7 votes |
+10.3 |
| מרץ מרצ - השמאל של ישראל | 13.89% 5 votes |
+9.3 |
| מחל הליכוד - ישראל ביתנו בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 8.33% 3 votes |
−15.0 |
| צפ התנועה בראשות ציפי לבני | 2.78% 1 votes |
−2.2 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 1 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (2.0%), even where their share here was far larger.
| קנ | עלה ירוק - הרשימה הליברלית | 19.44% | 7 | +18.3 |
What happened to these votes
7 people in Kerem Shalom voted for עלה ירוק - הרשימה הליברלית. None of them elected anyone.
The list took 19.44% here, 16.9 times its national share. Nationally it stopped at 1.15%, below the 2.0% threshold, and won no seats.
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
38 voters out of 87 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Kerem Shalom against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Barqay · Ramat Razi'el · Ramot Me'ir
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 15 times the number of valid votes).
| Barqay | 308 |
| Ramat Razi'el | 325 |
| Ramot Me'ir | 366 |
| Bet Hillel | 368 |
| Bet Alfa | 435 |
| Kefar HaHoresh | 323 |
| Bet HaEmeq | 314 |
| Kerem Maharal | 428 |
9 elections in Kerem Shalom
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 153 | 89 | 58.2% | −12.5 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 151 | 75 | 49.7% | −17.8 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 145 | 82 | 56.6% | −15.0 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 136 | 69 | 50.7% | −19.1 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 126 | 68 | 54.0% | −14.5 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 95 | 48 | 50.5% | −21.8 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 87 | 38 | 43.7% | −24.1 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 76 | 28 | 36.8% | −25.7 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 29 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.