Kerem Shalom
How Kerem Shalom voted in 2020
81 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| פה כחול לבן בראשות בני גנץ | 25.93% 21 votes |
−0.7 |
| טב ימינה הימין החדש – הבית היהודי – האיחוד הלאומי | 24.69% 20 votes |
+19.4 |
| מחל הליכוד בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 20.99% 17 votes |
−8.5 |
| אמת העבודה - גשר - מרצ | 16.05% 13 votes |
+10.2 |
| ודעם הרשימה המשותפת חד"ש, רע"מ, תע"ל, בל"ד | 4.94% 4 votes |
−7.7 |
| ג יהדות התורה והשבת אגודת ישראל - דגל התורה | 3.70% 3 votes |
−2.3 |
| ל ישראל ביתנו בראשות אביגדור ליברמן | 2.47% 2 votes |
−3.3 |
| שס התאחדות הספרדים שומרי תורה תנועתו של מרן הרב עובדיה יוסף זצ"ל | 1.23% 1 votes |
−6.5 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
82 voters out of 145 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Kerem Shalom against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Matta · Sho'eva · Kinneret(Moshava)
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Matta | 398 |
| Sho'eva | 356 |
| Kinneret(Moshava) | 377 |
| Tidhar | 302 |
| Shilat | 400 |
| Giv'at HaShelosha | 386 |
| Lotem | 356 |
| Bat Hen | 315 |
9 elections in Kerem Shalom
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 153 | 89 | 58.2% | −12.5 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 151 | 75 | 49.7% | −17.8 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 145 | 82 | 56.6% | −15.0 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 136 | 69 | 50.7% | −19.1 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 126 | 68 | 54.0% | −14.5 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 95 | 48 | 50.5% | −21.8 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 87 | 38 | 43.7% | −24.1 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 76 | 28 | 36.8% | −25.7 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 29 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.